Combining environmental DNA and visual surveys can inform conservation planning for coral reefs.

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has the potential to revolutionize conservation planning by providing spatially and taxonomically comprehensive data on biodiversity and ecosystem conditions, but its utility to inform the design of protected areas remains untested. Here, we quantify whether and how identifying conservation priority areas within coral reef ecosystems differs when biodiversity information is collected via eDNA analyses or traditional visual census records. We focus on 147 coral reefs in Indonesia's hyper-diverse Wallacea region and show large discrepancies in the allocation and spatial design of conservation priority areas when coral reef species were surveyed with underwater visual techniques (fishes, corals, and algae) or eDNA metabarcoding (eukaryotes and metazoans). Specifically, incidental protection occurred for 55% of eDNA species when targets were set for species detected by visual surveys and 71% vice versa. This finding is supported by generally low overlap in detection between visual census and eDNA methods at species level, with more overlap at higher taxonomic ranks. Incomplete taxonomic reference databases for the highly diverse Wallacea reefs, and the complementary detection of species by the two methods, underscore the current need to combine different biodiversity data sources to maximize species representation in conservation planning.

Digitally Recording Comfort Observations in the Last Days of Life.

Background: 37.5% of deaths in our area occur in hospital. There are known high unmet needs of adult patients dying in hospital, this unmet need can be reduced by using an individualised care plan and specialist palliative care review. Intervention: In 2022 UHSussex developed an electronic comfort observation chart and individualised care plan, with a centralised dashboard allowing Palliative Care Teams (SPCT) to view trends, target interventions, and a rolling prospective audit. Results: 3000 patients have had their care supported with electronic comfort observations (e-comfort obs). Over 72% of all deaths in the Trust in the last 3 months have been on e-comfort obs, with 2/3 of all deaths in the first 12 months on e-comfort obs. The average length of time on e-comfort obs is 4 days resulting in 70,000 sets of e-comfort obs recorded since launch. Seven percent of e-comfort obs record moderate or severe symptoms. We have identified benefits to people who are dying, those important to them, ward staff, SPCT and on a systems level. Conclusion: E-comfort obs can be successfully embedded in a large acute Trust. This development should improve quality of end of life care in our hospitals both for individuals and for future patients, through on-going targeted education and intervention. Further work is needed to develop the system further including integrating data from electronic prescribing.

Evaluation of Palliative Care Related Hospital Admissions in a Regional Centre.

OBJECTIVES: A significant proportion of adults admitted to hospital are in their last year of life. We evaluated admissions for these patients. METHODS: We identified ambulance callouts to patients known to the palliative care team. Data collected included admission outcome (e.g. discharge or death). RESULTS: There were 162 ambulance callouts between 126 patients known to the palliative care team. 8 patients (6%) died within 72 hours of admission. CONCLUSION: Our data suggests many palliative care patients can be appropriately treated in the community.

Seeking Excellence in End of Life Care UK (SEECare UK): a UK multi-centred service evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the care of patients dying in hospital without support from specialists in palliative care (SPC), better understand their needs and factors influencing their care. METHODS: Prospective UK-wide service evaluation including all dying adult inpatients unknown to SPC, excluding those in emergency departments/intensive care units. Holistic needs were assessed through a standardised proforma. RESULTS: 88 hospitals, 284 patients. 93% had unmet holistic needs, including physical symptoms (75%) and psycho-socio-spiritual needs (86%). People were more likely to have unmet needs and require SPC intervention at a district general hospital (DGH) than a teaching hospital/cancer centre (unmet need 98.1% vs 91.2% p0.02; intervention 70.9% vs 50.8% p0.001) and when end-of-life care plans (EOLCP) were not used (unmet need 98.3% vs 90.3% p0.006; intervention 67.2% vs 53.3% p0.02). Multivariable analyses demonstrated the independent influence of teaching/cancer hospitals (adjusted OR (aOR)0.44 CI 0.26 to 0.73) and increased SPC medical staffing (aOR1.69 CI 1.04 to 2.79) on need for intervention, however, integrating the use of EOLCP reduced the impact of SPC medical staffing. CONCLUSION: People dying in hospitals have significant and poorly identified unmet needs. Further evaluation is required to understand the relationships between patient, staff and service factors influencing this. The development, effective implementation and evaluation of structured individualised EOLCP should be a research funding priority.

Cancer centre supportive oncology service: health economic evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: There have been many models of providing oncology and palliative care to hospitals. Many patients will use the hospital non-electively or semielectively, and a large proportion are likely to be in the last years of life. We describe our multidisciplinary service to treatable but not curable cancer patients at University Hospitals Sussex. The team was a mixture of clinical nurse specialists and a clinical fellow supported by dedicated palliative medicine consultant time and oncology expertise. METHODS: We identified patients with cancer who had identifiable supportive care needs and record activity with clinical coding. We used a baseline 2019/2020 dataset of national (secondary uses service) data with discharge code 79 (patients who died during that year) to compare a dataset of patients seen by the service between September 2020 and September 2021 in order to compare outcomes. While this was during COVID-19 this was when the funding was available. RESULTS: We demonstrated a reduction in length of stay by an average of 1.43 days per admission and a reduction of 0.95 episodes of readmission rates. However, the costs of those admissions were found to be marginally higher. Even with the costs of the service, there is a clear return on investment with a benefit cost ratio of 1.4. CONCLUSIONS: A supportive oncology service alongside or allied to acute oncology but in conjunction with palliative care is feasible and cost-effective. This would support investment in such a service and should be nationally commissioned in conjunction with palliative care services seeing all conditions.

Seeking Excellence in End of Life Care (SEE Care): A Multi-Centered Acute Hospitals Service Evaluation.

CONTEXT: A proportion of UK hospital inpatients have palliative care needs but do not access specialist services. OBJECTIVES: To contemporaneously evaluate the significance of unmet specialist palliative care needs within the hospital inpatient population. METHODS: Prospective multi-centered service evaluation was conducted through 4 snapshots across 4 acute NHS hospital trusts. All patients identified as dying in each hospital were included. Data extraction included symptom burden, medications and completion of care plans. RESULTS: End-of-life care plans were completed for 73%, symptom-focused prescribing present in 96%. Symptoms were not well managed for 22%, with 4% suffering moderate to severely. Specific intervention was triggered in 56% of patients, consisting of prescribing advice and holistic support. CONCLUSION: There are significant unmet specialist palliative care needs within the hospital inpatient population. Contemporaneous data collection coupled with an outreach approach helps palliative care services better understand the experiences of dying people, alongside where improvement is needed.

Care of the dying person before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A quality improvement project.

The current COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated the redeployment of NHS staff to acute-facing specialties, meaning that care of dying people is being provided by those who may not have much experience in this area. This report details how a plan, do, study, act (PDSA) approach was taken to implementing improved, standardised multidisciplinary documentation of individualised care and review for people who are in the last hours or days of life, both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The documentation and training produced is subject to ongoing review via the specialist palliative care team's continuously updated hospital deaths dashboard, which evaluates the care of patients who have died in the trust. We hope that sharing the experiences and outcomes of this process will help other trusts to develop their own pathways and improve the care of dying people through this difficult time and beyond.